<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wishlist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archertarot.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wishlist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archertarot.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wishlist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:59:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: archertarot</title>
		<link>http://archertarot.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wishlist/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>archertarot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archertarot.wordpress.com/?p=277#comment-210</guid>
		<description>The Javanne looks interesting. It reminds me a little of the Shining Tribe.

The Shadowscapes IS very pretty but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s limited to just that. SPML seems to have put quite a bit of thought into the images. Of course, it&#039;s impossible to say how a deck will hold up to scrutiny until you&#039;re actually reading with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Javanne looks interesting. It reminds me a little of the Shining Tribe.</p>
<p>The Shadowscapes IS very pretty but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s limited to just that. SPML seems to have put quite a bit of thought into the images. Of course, it&#8217;s impossible to say how a deck will hold up to scrutiny until you&#8217;re actually reading with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balakirev</title>
		<link>http://archertarot.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wishlist/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Balakirev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archertarot.wordpress.com/?p=277#comment-201</guid>
		<description>When I first saw the Shadowscapes deck, up at Aeclectic, I thought, &quot;Oooo, pretty pictures!  Very pretty!&quot;  And of course, I wanted it at once, even before the artist was finished.  But from that link you provided, I realized that the cards actually don&#039;t seem to hold much resonance for me, as doors/gates.  They don&#039;t seem to lead anywhere, if you follow me.  That&#039;s utterly unlike, say, the Javanne tarot, which you can find here:

http://www.javannetarot.com/

Artistically it&#039;s very inferior to Shadowscapes, in terms of draftsmanship and coloration.  Nor does everything the designer says is in each picture actually appear in it; a problem associated with reducing larger images, and a particular bet noir of mine.  But...it is a deck that I knew I could connect to at once, given the primal way in which the images were provided.  And it works, for me.  Each card is a door.

Sorry for the musings, but your mention of Shadowscapes, and my rereading of your blog, brought it back to mind.  -You know, I still may end up buying Shadowscapes when it appears, simply because it *is* pretty, very artistically done.  But I apparently have a long time to decide, if it won&#039;t be out for at least another two years. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first saw the Shadowscapes deck, up at Aeclectic, I thought, &#8220;Oooo, pretty pictures!  Very pretty!&#8221;  And of course, I wanted it at once, even before the artist was finished.  But from that link you provided, I realized that the cards actually don&#8217;t seem to hold much resonance for me, as doors/gates.  They don&#8217;t seem to lead anywhere, if you follow me.  That&#8217;s utterly unlike, say, the Javanne tarot, which you can find here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.javannetarot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.javannetarot.com/</a></p>
<p>Artistically it&#8217;s very inferior to Shadowscapes, in terms of draftsmanship and coloration.  Nor does everything the designer says is in each picture actually appear in it; a problem associated with reducing larger images, and a particular bet noir of mine.  But&#8230;it is a deck that I knew I could connect to at once, given the primal way in which the images were provided.  And it works, for me.  Each card is a door.</p>
<p>Sorry for the musings, but your mention of Shadowscapes, and my rereading of your blog, brought it back to mind.  -You know, I still may end up buying Shadowscapes when it appears, simply because it *is* pretty, very artistically done.  But I apparently have a long time to decide, if it won&#8217;t be out for at least another two years. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archertarot</title>
		<link>http://archertarot.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wishlist/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>archertarot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archertarot.wordpress.com/?p=277#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the unending quest for more decks...

I&#039;ve just had a look at the Merryday and it wasn&#039;t what I thought it was at all. Quite nice though but thankfully not one for my wishlist. :)

I&#039;ve now got the Sheridan-Douglas and really like it. I&#039;ll probably post about it later in the week.

Lynda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the unending quest for more decks&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just had a look at the Merryday and it wasn&#8217;t what I thought it was at all. Quite nice though but thankfully not one for my wishlist. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve now got the Sheridan-Douglas and really like it. I&#8217;ll probably post about it later in the week.</p>
<p>Lynda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balakirev</title>
		<link>http://archertarot.wordpress.com/2008/09/06/wishlist/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Balakirev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archertarot.wordpress.com/?p=277#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Just got the MerryDay set and book, myself.  I&#039;d been waiting for a long time, until I finally read a post in one of the major tarot Yahoo groups stating that it was out of print--and that the post&#039;s author was willing to sell their copy for $100.

I immediately wrote a link in the group to the website and said that, as far as I knew, it was still available for nearly half that price from the deck&#039;s creator.  But then I got to thinking: why not finally get it?  At least it&#039;s not a Waite clone, and I&#039;ve made a promise to myself not to buy any more Waite clones.  It&#039;s quite original, so...

The final straw was when my wife&#039;s bonus came through, and she suggested I go ahead and buy it.  That&#039;s noble of her, though I&#039;m sure she&#039;s also planning some expenditures, herself. :D I took the hint, and the deck arrived relatively quickly.  The looseleaf bound book was largely about numerology, about which I have no interest, but there was a good section on the deck, itself.

Sorry for rambling on about this, but it somehow seemed pertinent to your own desire for more decks.  And good luck with your pregnancy! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got the MerryDay set and book, myself.  I&#8217;d been waiting for a long time, until I finally read a post in one of the major tarot Yahoo groups stating that it was out of print&#8211;and that the post&#8217;s author was willing to sell their copy for $100.</p>
<p>I immediately wrote a link in the group to the website and said that, as far as I knew, it was still available for nearly half that price from the deck&#8217;s creator.  But then I got to thinking: why not finally get it?  At least it&#8217;s not a Waite clone, and I&#8217;ve made a promise to myself not to buy any more Waite clones.  It&#8217;s quite original, so&#8230;</p>
<p>The final straw was when my wife&#8217;s bonus came through, and she suggested I go ahead and buy it.  That&#8217;s noble of her, though I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s also planning some expenditures, herself. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  I took the hint, and the deck arrived relatively quickly.  The looseleaf bound book was largely about numerology, about which I have no interest, but there was a good section on the deck, itself.</p>
<p>Sorry for rambling on about this, but it somehow seemed pertinent to your own desire for more decks.  And good luck with your pregnancy! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
