What I like about Lo Scarabeo

March 2, 2009 § 7 Comments

This week, I’ve had the great pleasure of perusing the new Lo Scarabeo Tarot Gallery, which is a lovely big hardback book featuring full colour samples of all their decks. To a tarot geek, it’s a thing of beauty; even though I know of all these decks, and even though I have – at one time or another – stocked most of them, I still get a thrill at every page turn. Decks that I thought I didn’t like somehow come to life when viewed in a double page glossy spread. Even – and this shocked the hell out of me – the Tarot of Reincarnation, which still may not look much like a tarot deck but does look extremely attractive.

I’m guessing the Tarot Gallery has been produced to create desire in retail stores. Browse these pages and dare to resist our wares!  However, this is much much more than a superficial selling tool. They’ve clearly invested a lot of time and effort in making it. The cards are actual size, which is great, and for those decks that feature gold and silver impressions, LS have glued a copy of the card to the page. Also, the sheer number of decks is mind-boggling. I counted 96! And these are in-print decks mind you, not discontinued ones (and it doesn’t even include any of the upcoming 2009 releases)!

Sometimes a lot of Lo Scarabeo bashing goes on at certain forums. Certain people seem to get personally offended that LS “churn out” so many decks with different themes every year, as if being prolific was a sign of low standards or even worse…gasp…commercialism.

But being prolific is just what I like about Lo Scarabeo: you never quite know what they’re going to do next. You may groan at the thought of a UFO Tarot or roll your eyes at the latest “Tarot of the Little Pink Pixies” (I made that up), but there’s no denying they always give you something to talk about. And there’s also no denying that they produce some very good and very beautiful decks: the Universal Fantasy, the Classic Tarot, the Nefertari, the Tarot of the Secret Forest, the Samurai Tarot…I could go on. Sometimes a deck is a “miss” but often their decks are resounding hits. 

What’s more, they have an energy and enthusiasm that you just don’t get from US Games/Llewellyn/AGMuller/etc. Lo Scarabeo constantly dare to try new things. Why not have a UFO Tarot? Why not a Manga Tarot or Tarot of the Robots? It’s important I think to remember that LS make playing cards as well. Some people like playing cards with cats on. Some like playing cards with cheeses of the world. LS seem to extend the same vision to tarot. “Wouldn’t it be nice to have a tarot deck featuring mermaids?” Does it need to be justifiable in some serious, studious tarot way? Of course not  – and anyway, who gets to decide what can or can’t be a tarot deck? Sometimes all a deck needs to be is pretty, or interesting. To a collector, all a deck needs is the word “tarot” in its name. 😉

They’re also willing to experiment with the format. They’ve brought out no end of mini tarots, and the lovely – and under-appreciated – grand trumps. They produce bags to match their decks. Last year they added spread cloths; this year they’re trying their hand at rune sets and some shiny chakra thingies. Last year they published a gorgeous book about their first 20 years. And this year they’ve produced this Tarot Gallery.

That’s why I like Lo Scarabeo, and why I think they’re still probably one of the most exciting – and hardest working – tarot publishers around. So there. 🙂

Advertisements

Tagged: ,

§ 7 Responses to What I like about Lo Scarabeo

  • tarotfluff says:

    I agree – LS rocks. I want the book now ! (do you stock it ?) And their LS Story is a great read, too. Fascinating discussion of how decks come to be.

  • Bummble says:

    Good points!

    I have quite a few LS decks I really like (the Manga, the Fey, the Secret).

    One thing I do miss sometimes is a proper companion book; there are a number of decks that are *really* interesting (the Liber T, for example) and seem to have a well thought-out plan behind them, but remain a bit impenetrable because the ‘system’ isn’t explained.

    I think there are a couple of decks that would be much more successful if there was a book with it, even if it’s just a glorified LWB like the Pearls of Wisdom has, or the World Spirit.
    (their actual LWB tend to be rather baffling, I find)

    I hope they’ll do more books in future, if only online, as pdf files, or something like that.

    But otherwise, year, what you said! 😉

  • Bummble says:

    Er, and by ‘year’ I mean ‘yeah’…

  • Quiet says:

    I agree also. I bought two LS decks recently and will get the new Mattioli deck when it is published. ‘Secret Forest’ is a favourite, one of the only decks I value from a difficult time. I can easily get lost in it but get sharp readings at the same time.

    LS seem to give their artists lots of latitude which has worked, I reckon. hye have come up with some great concepts in Tarot, essential for Tarot survival!

    With reference to companion books, I tend to agree. ‘Tarot of the Spirit World’ would have benefited from a companion book but the lack of it has made me rearch and think a lot more.

    Nice to see you still around, Archer. Hope the little babe is well.

  • archertarot says:

    Hi All!

    Tarotfluff – no I don’t stock this book (the Tarot Gallery) as it’s actually something LS are sending to retailers to allow customers to preview the cards. Technically I shouldn’t have one because my shop is online-only, but I was sent one by my supplier anyway. And, in my defense, I’m planning to use it to scan some images, so it will still enable customers to see the cards.

    I will, however, be stocking the LS story book in the next month or so – glad to hear you think it’s a great read.

    Bummble, you make a really good point about companion books. I would love one for the Universal Fantasy – not because the deck needs explaining so much, but because it would make for such enchanting reading!

    I would also be interested in one for the Tarot of the Secret Forest. I got mine about the same time as you got yours, Quiet, but I didn’t get on with it at all. Even though I think it’s lovely to look at, I couldn’t read with it. A book may have helped.

    On the other hand, books add a LOT to the cost of a deck and they make a product bulkier and heavier so more costly to store and ship. And how many people would be prepared to shell out for a book and deck over just a deck? In my experience as a retailer, not many. 😦

    Sorry, being all practical now… 😉

  • Bummble says:

    That’s why I think it might be a good idea for LS to look into publishing books online, or as pdf-files, or whatever.
    Then you could download it for free, or a couple of euros, if you’re really interested.

    From what I understand, the person who made the Liber-T tarot (which I have, but have never worked with; I like to collect ‘Thothy’ decks, but with a few exceptions I find them hard to read with) actually *wrote* a quite extensive book (and it’s a deck that could use one!), but it never got published. Such a shame of all his work!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading What I like about Lo Scarabeo at Archer Tarot.

meta

%d bloggers like this: